How Assessment Choice Affects Student Perception and Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v7i1.309Keywords:
Assessment choice, Action research, Course evaluation, Test anxiety, Logistic regressionAbstract
Abstract. This action research project examined the effect of student assessment choice on grades and course evaluations, the two assessment options being a reading quiz or a two-minute video recording of themselves recalling what they could about the text (a “recall”). In the baseline condition (year 1), students were encouraged to complete recall videos about reading assignments for a type of extra credit in addition to required multiple-choice reading quizzes. In the experimental year (year 2), students were instead allowed to replace reading quizzes with recalls. The data included student submissions, grades, and course evaluations. Students completed more recall assignments when the recall replaced the quiz requirement than during the baseline year when recalls could not replace quizzes. In addition, the instances of students completing both the quiz and recall (for extra credit) increased in the experimental year. Average course grades did not change from the baseline year to the experimental year, but students with higher course grades were significantly more likely to have completed recalls. Student evaluations of the instructor were significantly higher for “responses to diverse learning styles” in the experimental year compared to the baseline condition. The study shows that letting students choose the assessment type they prefer can lead to increased student engagement and improve their perception of the instructor’s responsiveness to learning styles, without causing grade inflation.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sanne Unger, Alanna Lecher
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Author (or Authors, collectively referred to herein as Author) retains the copyright for the Article/Review to be published in the Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education and is acknowledged in the copyright line on the Article/Review. The Author asserts the moral right to be identified as the Authors of the Article/Review.
Public License
- The Author and the Publisher (Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education) agree that the Author grants a Creative Commons Copyright License in the Article/Review to the general public (see Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0))
- The Author grants to the Publisher a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license to publish, reproduce, display, distribute and use the Article/Review in any form, either separately or as part of a collective work, including (but not limited to) a non-exclusive license to publish the article in an issue of the Journal, authorize reproduction of the entire Article/Review in another publication, and authorize reproduction and distribution of the Article/Review by means of computerized retrieval systems. The Author retains the ownership of all rights under copyright in the Article, and all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
- The Author agrees that the Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education be given credit as the original publisher in any republication of the Article/Review authorized by the Author. If the Publisher authorizes any other party to republish the article under the terms above, the Publisher shall require such party to ensure that the Author is properly credited.